[Janoshik] SSA tirz 10mg — 99.1%, third batch in a row above 99
Template, as required.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Vendor | SSA |
| Product | Tirzepatide 10mg |
| Batch | SSA-2606 |
| Service | Janoshik |
| Method | RP-HPLC, UV 214nm |
| Claimed | 99.0% |
| Result | 99.1% |
Third SSA tirzepatide batch above 99 in the community log, and importantly they are three different members and three different services — mine on Janoshik, one on Medutest at 99.0, one on PeptideMeter at 99.2.
Sample of one from me. Three independent members converging is not a sample of one.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The PeptideMeter one was mine. 99.2%, batch SSA-2507, different quarter entirely.
What makes this set unusual is the inter-service agreement. Three labs on three batches within 0.2 of each other is tighter than I would expect from variance alone, which is either a very consistent process or a very lucky run of three. Ask me again at six.
"ask me again at six" is the right amount of confidence and i should have written that instead of the last line.
third one is mine, 99.0 on Medutest. happy to be the boring corroborating data point.
the boring corroborating data point is the entire product. one exciting result is a story, three boring agreeing ones are evidence.
i say this constantly and get downvoted for it, and then someone says it better and gets upvoted. such is life.
you usually say it as an objection to someone else. same content, different social position. genuinely not your fault.
Template complete, batch present, method present. This is what the flair requirement is for. Nothing to do here except say thank you.
obligatory reminder that this vendor is not the similarly-named reagent multinational and not the other similarly-named Shanghai company. three separate entities. we have had to write that down three times.
re-verified in 2025. unrelated entity, 2018 establishment, checks out. it is on the source page in bold for exactly this reason.
i had absolutely made that mistake before reading this
the one under-claim result on their page is a 97.8 sema against a 98.5 claim. worth keeping visible even though it is well inside variance. edit: it is on the source page, i checked before typing this, which is a novelty for me.
2018 entity with this record is genuinely a shorter track history than the number suggests. not a criticism, just a caveat.
- 1The PeptideMeter one was mine. 99.2%, batch SSA-2507, different quarter…6 comments in this branch · started by u/peptidemeter_pat