why does nobody talk about test results
Asking properly rather than in a comment on somebody else’s thread: why does nobody talk about test results. Tested three lots over a year rather than three vials from one lot. Cost the same and told me something completely different. Sent a vial in specifically to check a supplier’s claim after a good experience. It…
Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one. Quote which, or the comparison downstream is meaningless.
Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one.
Adding the boring but useful bit: say whether you paid for it. It is the basis of the whole log.
the log is cumulative, that is the whole value of it
Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one.
This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.
This is why the template has a batch field.
saskia_mwangi is right that the band matters more than the peak. Consistency across lots is the finding.
[removed by moderator]
if you are going to test, test the thing you actually received
one result is a data point, agreement between two services is evidence