why does nobody talk about Medutest
why does nobody talk about Medutest. If this has been answered properly somewhere, link me and I will delete. Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way. A series across separate lots estimates a process. Repeat…
Yes — date of analysis, because a result from two years ago describes a different manufacturing month.
Right, and a point or two between services is ordinary. It is agreement, and every month somebody posts it as a scandal.
Correction: that is the claimed figure, and the measured one is the higher of the two in your own screenshot.
results without method are gossip with decimals
split a vial across two services once and you will never argue about ground truth again
Kept every report as a PDF with the batch in the filename. Two years in, it is the most useful folder I own.