GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the batch advice in here is 3 years out of date — 24 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.5k
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/aussie_pbs_watch

[Discussion] the batch advice in here is 3 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

the batch advice in here is 3 years out of date. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. The relevant figures are 3 years, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. Split one vial between Janoshik and Medutest. The two numbers were within half a point of each other and…

Read the full submission and all 24 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 years ago
u/cold_chromatogram_only0 points·2 years ago

Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_nkemelu1 point·2 years ago

say whether you paid for it yourself

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_verhoeven1 point·2 years ago

That service reports area percent by default. Worth stating, since the thread has been comparing it to a mass figure.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso1 point·2 years ago

Homopeptide came back 99.1% on a claimed 98.5%, which is agreement not a discrepancy

replysharereportpermalink
u/aussie_pbs_watchOPAU1 point·2 years ago

Correcting myself: I quoted net peptide content against somebody else’s area percent. Not a comparison.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.