GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 2 years out of date — 67 comments in the full submission. View in context.
4.2k
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/usp_appendix

[Discussion] the purity advice in here is 2 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

the purity advice in here is 2 years out of date. Making the case below, and I expect to lose some of it in the comments. Pulling the figures out of the title: 2 years. All of it is written down as it happened rather than reconstructed. Inter-lab variance on this assay runs roughly a point either way, driven mostly…

Read the full submission and all 67 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/lift_heavy_thingsresistance training83 points·2 years ago

say whether you paid for it yourself

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixOPcompendial65 points·2 years ago

Batch number and date of analysis?

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]25 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/britta_boateng22 points·2 years ago

GL Biochem BPC, batch matched the paperwork, PeptideMeter came back 97.8% against a claimed 97.0%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if people do.

replysharereportpermalink
u/endotoxin_elliemicro37 points·2 years ago

Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_jansen44 points·2 years ago·edited

vendor, compound, batch, service, result — that is the template

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_restrepo-19 points·2 years ago

net peptide content if the report gives it, and say which you are quoting

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.