GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Meta] the Janoshik rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining — 68 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.1k
c/labresults·submitted 1 year ago by u/georgi_chowdhury

[Meta] the Janoshik rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining

Medutestbranch of 6 comments

the Janoshik rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining — posting the reasoning in public because a policy you cannot inspect is just a preference. Tested three lots over a year rather than three vials from one lot. Cost the same and told me something completely different. Sent a vial in specifically to…

Read the full submission and all 68 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/tuva_kirchner241 points·1 year ago

Inter-lab variance on this assay runs roughly a point either way, driven mostly by gradient and integration. Two results inside that band agree; they do not disagree quietly.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]180 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarity-9 points·1 year ago

ERP BPC, batch matched the paperwork, Medutest came back 98.1% against a claimed 97.5%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if people do.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_trevino148 points·1 year ago

Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_melMOD88 points·1 year ago

Merged with the other thread on the same batch so the results sit together.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_wojcik0 points·1 year ago

Inter-lab variance on this assay runs roughly a point either way, driven mostly by gradient and integration.

Disagreeing with this line: that gap is ordinary variance, not a contradiction between the lab and the certificate.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.