GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 2 years out of date — 42 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.9k
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/bianca_demir

[Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 2 years out of date

Discussionbranch of 8 comments

the PeptideMeter advice in here is 2 years out of date. Making the case below, and I expect to lose some of it in the comments. To save the first four comments: 2 years. Sent a vial in specifically to check a supplier’s claim after a good experience. It matched. Boring result, worth logging. Have now spent more on…

Read the full submission and all 42 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 years ago
u/noor_cardoso191 points·2 years ago

First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim. Fair, and my posts have been better ever since.

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial44 points·2 years ago

Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one. Quote which, or the comparison downstream is meaningless.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_oyelaran20 points·2 years ago

results without method are gossip with decimals

replysharereportpermalink
u/plateau_patrol8 points·2 years ago·edited

say whether you paid for it yourself

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_rahimi36 points·2 years ago

Disagree that this is a discrepancy. 99.6% against a claimed 99.0% is inside ordinary inter-lab variance in either direction.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aksel_jansen22 points·2 years ago

Do you have the trace, or only the summary?

replysharereportpermalink
u/bianca_demirOP13 points·2 years ago

How many separate lots does your series cover?

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_diallo25 points·2 years ago

SGN BPC, batch matched the paperwork, Medutest came back 99.6% against a claimed 99.0%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if people do.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.