how much of what we believe about purity actually comes from batch threads
The title is the whole question — how much of what we believe about purity actually comes from batch threads — but here is why I am asking. The template is vendor, compound, batch, service, claim, result, and who paid. Every one of those fields exists because a result missing it has been argued about here before. How…
area percent unless the report says otherwise
Yes. Two services on the same batch is the strongest thing an individual member can produce, and it is not expensive.
Batch number and date of analysis?
Batch number and date of analysis?
Disagreeing with this line: that gap is ordinary variance, not a contradiction between the lab and the certificate.
First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim. Fair, and my posts have been better ever since.
three lots beats three tests on one lot
Small fix — same supplier, different lot. The two rows in the log are not the same batch.