GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
678
c/labresults·posted 2 years ago by u/crp_curious

[Vendor] FGP vs SWB on the same compound, same month — both cleared 99.0%

Janoshik Long Haul ×1

FGP vs SWB on the same compound, same month — both cleared 99.0%. I will put the method line and the batch identifier up front because that is what makes this checkable.

99.0%. Those are measured, not estimated, and not rounded up in my favour.

The template is vendor, compound, batch, service, claim, result, and who paid. Every one of those fields exists because a result missing it has been argued about here before.

Inter-lab variance on this assay runs roughly a point either way, driven mostly by gradient and integration. Two results inside that band agree; they do not disagree quietly.

That is everything I have. The rest is opinion and I have tried to keep it out.

1,051 up / 373 down74% upvoted5 commentsid 1lrcit16 Jul 2024
Suppliers named in this thread
The source page carries the verification log and every independent test a member has paid for. The storefront link is marked nofollow and sponsored; nobody here is paid for it.

5 comments

3 in this archive, depth 2

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/reship_roulette73 points·2 years ago

Chain of custody is why member-funded testing is worth more than a supplied certificate: the vial tested is the vial that arrived at a member’s door.

replysharereportpermalink
u/medutest_melMOD39 points·2 years ago

Left up and added to the vendor source page log. Thanks for paying for it and posting it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulen47 points·2 years ago

If the report gives a mass spectrum as well as UV purity, say so. Identity and relative quantity are separate claims and the log tracks both.

replysharereportpermalink
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →