the mean transit time is useless, the 90th percentile is what melts your pack
Been lurking in c/customs for about 12 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 93, 1.0mg, and transit time is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 39 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 87.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with carrier, not with what you concluded.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
origin to destination, carrier, transit variance
customs clearance often adds 2 days, factor that in
QST Sweden to Sweden: 4 days with QST shipping, 37 days with customs. No drama.
the community lane table lives here
DHL was 17 days door-to-door but reship. EMS took 16 days but cheaper and fine.
Homopeptide ships from Denmark, arrival is 11 to 26 days on average
the lane table is community-maintained, EMS changes
the community lane table lives here
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
the community lane table lives here
Australia to Australia: QST with 6 days is the average, variance is 36
[removed by moderator]
Strongly agree. Customs adds unpredictable delay.
origin to destination, carrier, transit variance
packaging quality matters on the 2-hour segments
- 1the community lane table lives here9 comments in this branch · started by u/fatima_asante
- 2Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with carrier, not with what…6 comments in this branch · started by u/graph_it_gary