GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
1.7k

[Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on formulary

Question Receipts ×6 Well Actually ×1

the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on formulary, and I want the answer with the reasoning attached rather than just the conclusion.

Kept a log with every date, name of department and reference number. When they claimed no record of a call, I had the reference.

Prior authorisation criteria are republished each plan year. A criterion that blocked you in one year may not exist in the next, so a denial is worth retesting after the turnover.

Asked for the policy bulletin by number and wrote the appeal against its criteria line by line. Approved on the second level after a flat first-level denial.

I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.

1,730 up / 59 down97% upvoted28 commentsid 1d4p8f20 Apr 2026

28 comments

13 in this archive, depth 6

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/marisol_moreau247 points·3 months ago·edited

Employer-sponsored plans may be regulated differently from individually purchased ones, which changes both the appeal route and which regulator hears a complaint.

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_lokken-32 points·3 months ago

Appeal deadlines run from the date on the determination letter. They are strict, they are short, and a missed deadline usually forfeits that level entirely.

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarity1 point·3 months ago

That criterion is from the previous plan year. The current bulletin has different wording.

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_lokken1 point·3 months ago

New plan year, entirely new criteria, and the denial that had been immovable in the autumn simply did not apply in January.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_trevino1 point·3 months ago·edited

New plan year, entirely new criteria, and the denial that had been immovable in the autumn simply did not apply in January.

saskia_lokken is right that this is documentation rather than persuasion. It took me a year to accept that.

replysharereportpermalink
u/line_petrov1 point·3 months ago

a template letter that quotes their own criteria back is the strongest one

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_nascimento1 point·3 months ago

Which country and which plan year are we talking about?

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_vukovic1 point·3 months ago

A peer-to-peer conversation puts the prescribing clinician in front of a reviewing clinician. It bypasses the correspondence cycle entirely and is often the fastest available route.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]1 point·3 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/gustav_vermeulen1 point·3 months ago

Disagree with the tone strategy. Anger has never moved a determination; matching the criterion has.

replysharereportpermalink
u/saskia_lokken1 point·3 months ago·edited

Small fix — external review is independent of the plan. The second-level internal appeal is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_vanhecke195 points·3 months ago

Yes. Written, always, even when they tell you a phone call is sufficient.

replysharereportpermalink
u/controversial_only124 points·3 months ago·edited

Correction: that is a formulary exclusion, not a prior authorisation denial. Different form, different route, different deadline.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/insurancefights

The paperwork war. Prior-authorisation criteria, denial reason codes, step-therapy documentation, external review, employer carve-outs, and the appeal letter templates the community has iterated on for three years. Mostly US-shaped but the tactics generalise.

46kmembers
95submissions
Dec 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/insurancefights rules
  1. Say which country and which plan type. "Insurance" means eleven different things.
  2. Redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot.
  3. Do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis. That is fraud and it gets you banned.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.