GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [PSA] chromatogram is not what most of this community thinks it is — 21 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.8k
c/hplc·submitted 2 months ago by u/nabila_espinoza

[PSA] chromatogram is not what most of this community thinks it is

Questionbranch of 8 comments

chromatogram is not what most of this community thinks it is. Two minutes of reading now saves an argument later. Started reporting my own integrations with the baseline choice stated. Arguments in my threads dropped by about half. Reading a trace posted here, in the order I actually look at things. Axes first — if…

Read the full submission and all 21 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 months ago
u/hana_lehtinen86 points·2 months ago

A shoulder that does not baseline-resolve cannot be quantified honestly. You can report it as an unresolved shoulder, which is useful information, or you can develop the method until it resolves.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dizzy_on_standing32 points·2 months ago

two labs, two gradients, two honest answers

replysharereportpermalink
u/ravi_bergstrom14 points·2 months ago

reproducibility beats resolution if you only get one of them

replysharereportpermalink
u/first_hundred59 points·2 months ago

That is area percent, not mass percent. The trace cannot give you the second one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_szabo-1 point·2 months ago

a shoulder is not an impurity until you can resolve it

replysharereportpermalink
u/nabila_espinozaOP1 point·2 months ago

Same method at both labs, or two different gradients?

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·2 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/nabila_espinozaOP1 point·2 months ago

report the method or do not report the number

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/hplc

The analytical deep end: RP-HPLC methods, gradient design, integration decisions, LC-MS confirmation, amino-acid analysis, water content, and why two labs can report 98.1% and 96.4% on the same vial and both be right. Post the chromatogram, not the summary line.

32kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/hplc rules
  1. Chromatogram or it did not happen. Axis labels included.
  2. State the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume.
  3. Area% is not mass%. Posts that conflate them get a correction flair, not a removal.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.