retention time shifted 0.4 min and nobody wants to talk about it
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking method development against eGFR for 19 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab,…
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.9% on the same vial is normal.
the gradient is doing the separation work, not the column alone
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
a round-robin on baseline integration would be genuinely useful
Adding to this: method development is doing more work than the comment implies.