[Results] perimenopause, 18 months, and why the usual advice failed me
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: cycle matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 2 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 39 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, insulin resistance is under-researched.
This is correct. PCOS is real.
Yeah, perimenopause is under-researched.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
cycle changes are real and under-researched
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
fertility signal is there but unclear
the cycle tracking data matters, keep it private
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with PCOS, not with what you concluded.
- 1Yeah, insulin resistance is under-researched.6 comments in this branch · started by u/joaquin_trevino
- 2Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…4 comments in this branch · started by u/devils_advocate_d