reading MHRA threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
Thinking out loud about this: reading MHRA threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly.
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have their own arrangements. An answer that begins with "in England" should say so, and most of the confusion here comes from answers that do not.
Concentrations can differ between products and between pharmacies. Switching mid-titration means redoing the arithmetic rather than carrying the old unit count across.
Two years and four months on a tier 3 list. Referral date and every letter kept, which turned out to matter when the service reorganised.
Please do not ask me what dose you should be on. I genuinely do not know and neither does anyone else here.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Pharmacy pricing on a private prescription is set by the pharmacy. The spread between them in a given month is routinely substantial, which is why a tracker built from member reports is more useful than any headline.
The online consultation asked me three questions, none of them about my history. I did not go ahead.
Switched pharmacies mid-titration and had to restart the ladder because the concentrations did not line up.
[deleted]
specialist service, not GP, for tier 3 in most of England
Same. My ICB threshold was different from the neighbouring one and nobody could tell me why.
Discharge from a specialist service at goal is a normal end point of that pathway. Whether prescribing continues in primary care afterwards is a local decision and is worth asking about at the start rather than at the end.
Discharge from a specialist service at goal is a normal end point of that pathway.
Agreed — and keeping the letters with dates is what makes any later challenge possible.
Read the MHRA notice rather than the news coverage and the actual scope was much narrower than the panic threads suggested.
Discharged at goal back to the GP, who would not continue it. Nobody had mentioned that this was how it ends.
Is this a discharge back to the GP, or a discontinuation?
discharge at goal back to the GP is where a lot of people fall over
Which nation, and which ICB if you are in England?
Yes — four nations, four pathways, and threads that ignore that give people the wrong answer confidently.
Right, and reading the actual supply notice rather than the coverage of it saves a fortnight of speculation.
Not convinced — the US threads are a different system entirely and importing their advice here does real harm.
Not convinced — the US threads are a different system entirely and importing their advice here does real harm.
This is why national advice does not work here. It is commissioned locally and it varies.
Supply notices from the regulator describe expected availability at a national level. They do not predict what any individual pharmacy has on the shelf next week.
Left up. It names a nation and an ICB, which is all we ask of a pathway post.
How long have you been on the list, and from what date?
an online consultation that asks you nothing is not a consultation
Cosigning on discharge at goal. It catches people who have done everything right and did not know it was coming.
That is Scotland’s arrangement and the post is asking about England.
no referral links, ever, and that rule is why the pricing threads work
- 1Pharmacy pricing on a private prescription is set by the pharmacy. The…6 comments in this branch · started by u/ignacio_roos