GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of tried protein for 24 weeks. here is what happened. — 26 comments in the full submission. View in context.
601
c/glp1muscle·submitted 1 year ago by u/reflux_report

tried protein for 24 weeks. here is what happened.

Databranch of 6 comments

Something I keep coming back to: tried protein for 24 weeks. here is what happened. Pulling the figures out of the title: 24 weeks. All of it is written down as it happened rather than reconstructed. Reduced appetite makes hitting a protein target a logistics problem rather than a motivation problem, which is why the…

Read the full submission and all 26 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/viktor_girard20 points·1 year ago

DEXA has a meaningful coefficient of variation, and it differs between machines and protocols. Comparing scans from different clinics adds a systematic offset that is invisible on the report.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_okwuosa29 points·1 year ago

Fat-free mass index is a ratio of fat-free mass to height squared. It moves when either term does, which makes it awkward to interpret during active weight change.

replysharereportpermalink
u/janek_ferrari20 points·1 year ago·edited

Small fix — that is fat-free mass, not muscle mass. The scan cannot separate them the way the post assumes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_reportOP11 points·1 year ago

Lost slower for six months deliberately and my composition change was not obviously different. Training was what mattered.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_amankwah14 points·1 year ago

Compared two scans from different clinics and panicked over a difference that was inside the error margin.

replysharereportpermalink
u/erez_yilmaz10 points·1 year ago

Push back: strength dropping in a deficit is not the same as lean mass loss. Related, not identical.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.