GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of three years of protein threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2k
c/glp1muscle·submitted 7 months ago by u/cold_chromatogram_only

three years of protein threads, summarised so you do not have to read them

Resultsbranch of 7 comments

three years of protein threads, summarised so you do not have to read them — a position I have arrived at slowly and would like tested. Strength retention is an imperfect but free longitudinal proxy: it is affected by neural factors and by being in a deficit, so it tracks tissue change loosely rather than exactly.…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 7 months ago
u/rasmus_kuipers66 points·7 months ago

Nothing here is a training or nutrition prescription. Targets and programmes are matters for somebody who knows your history and your training background.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_mensah20 points·7 months ago

Agreed on the error margin. Quoting a DEXA to one decimal implies a precision the method does not have.

replysharereportpermalink
u/karl_fischer_kev22 points·7 months ago

Cosigning that protein gets harder precisely when appetite drops. That is the actual difficulty and it is logistical.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_fonseca18 points·7 months ago

the scale cannot distinguish tissue types and never could

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_boateng11 points·7 months ago

Are you comparing against your own baseline or against a published average?

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_broberg9 points·7 months ago

the scale cannot distinguish tissue types and never could

ahmed_fonseca is right that protein becomes a logistics problem when appetite drops.

replysharereportpermalink
u/formulary_fighterappeals6 points·7 months ago

a single DEXA is a number, two is a comparison, three is a trend

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.