[Country] DE — Apotheke pricing, Rezept process, what off-label actually costs
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on reimbursement in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
pharmacy stock varies by country and season
Strongly agree.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
This is correct. Tag your country.
Which country? Rules differ.
EMA and national agency claims need citation
EMA and national agency claims need citation
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 87 weeks to accept.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
apotheke, receta, pharmacy — twenty-seven different answers
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…8 comments in this branch · started by u/throwaway_44b1
- 2Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.8 comments in this branch · started by u/eu_apotheke_a