GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] Canada is doing more work than we give it credit for — 41 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.9k
c/glp1canada·submitted 9 months ago by u/liv_dumitru

[Discussion] Canada is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussionbranch of 10 comments

The title is the argument: Canada is doing more work than we give it credit for. Here is the rest of it. Criteria changed at plan renewal and the denial that had been immovable simply did not apply any more. Compared cash prices across four pharmacies before pursuing coverage and the spread was larger than I…

Read the full submission and all 41 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 9 months ago
u/first_pen_fear129 points·9 months ago

Is there a quantity limit involved rather than a coverage refusal?

replysharereportpermalink
u/karim_restrepo-12 points·9 months ago

Push back: approval by the national regulator says nothing about whether any plan will pay.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitruOP1 point·9 months ago

Correcting myself: it was a quantity limit rather than a denial, which changes the whole process.

replysharereportpermalink
u/erez_baptista1 point·9 months ago

formulary decisions are provincial, so the province is the first fact

replysharereportpermalink
u/karim_ilunga1 point·9 months ago

Careful, that criterion was updated at renewal and the version you are quoting is superseded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitruOP1 point·9 months ago

Those criteria were revised at renewal, so the version quoted upthread is out of date.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitruOP1 point·9 months ago

a denial letter names a criterion, that is your handle

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post1 point·9 months ago

Right, and the pharmacist can usually give a definite answer faster than a week of forum speculation.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hair_shed_hannah1 point·9 months ago

Same view — private and provincial plans are genuinely different processes with different appeal routes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anya_antonsen53 points·9 months ago·edited

Yes. Cash prices vary and comparing them before assuming coverage is the only route is worth doing.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1canada

Canadian access: provincial formulary differences, private plan coverage, the special-authorisation process, cross-border pricing arbitrage and why the Ontario answer is not the Alberta answer.

17kmembers
62submissions
Apr 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/glp1canada rules
  1. Name your province. Coverage is provincial.
  2. Private plan details: redact your group number.
  3. No cross-border purchasing instructions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.