New Zealand: Canada, and what it actually costs here
New Zealand: Canada, and what it actually costs here. Not a hot take, just something I have not seen said plainly here.
Special authorization is a documented exception process with published criteria. Applications that answer those criteria explicitly, point by point, fare better than general clinical narratives.
How to write a special authorization request that gets approved.
Get the published criteria for your province. Answer them explicitly, in their own terms, in the same order. Attach what has been documented — what was tried, at what dose, for how long, with what outcome — as dates rather than narrative. Where a criterion cannot be met, have the prescriber say why in the criterion’s own language rather than around it.
Members here who have done this describe a much better hit rate than those who submitted a clinical letter that did not engage with the form. It is an administrative exercise, and treating it as one is the whole trick. None of which is advice — it is what the threads report.
Cash pricing, which people skip because they assume coverage is the only route.
Prices at the counter vary between pharmacies, sometimes substantially, in the same city. Members here have found spreads worth a real amount per month by ringing four places and asking for the cash price of a specific presentation.
That does not make coverage unimportant. It does mean that while an authorization is in process — which can take weeks — knowing the actual cash spread is worth half an hour of phone calls. Post what you find with the province and the month; the comparison threads here work for exactly the same reason the UK pricing tracker does.
Tell me where this is wrong. That is the useful part of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Quantity limits restrict how much may be dispensed in a period even where coverage exists. They are a distinct barrier and require a distinct request.
[deleted]
formulary decisions are provincial, so the province is the first fact
formulary decisions are provincial, so the province is the first fact
adaeze_batista is right that a rejected claim and a denied authorization are different animals.
A rejected claim at the pharmacy counter and a denied authorization are different events with different remedies. The first can be an administrative or quantity issue; the second is a determination you can appeal.
Read the special authorization criteria and wrote the application against them line by line. Approved first time after a previous refusal.
What did the denial actually say?
Have you asked the pharmacist to check?
Have you seen the special authorization criteria for your province?
Nothing here is medical or legal advice. The pharmacist and the prescriber are the people who can act, and both are faster than a forum.
Moved provinces and the coverage position changed completely. Same person, same history, different formulary.
Disagree — that is your province’s formulary position and it does not carry to another.
the same product can be covered in one province and not the next
a rejected claim is not the same as a denied authorization
Health Canada approval is not coverage
Push back: approval by the national regulator says nothing about whether any plan will pay.
Yes. Approval and coverage are separate, and this board conflates them in about half its threads.
Is there a quantity limit involved rather than a coverage refusal?
- 1Read the special authorization criteria and wrote the application against…12 comments in this branch · started by u/lipid_panel_larry