three years of compounding threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
three years of compounding threads, summarised so you do not have to read them. I have gone back and forth on this for months. The two decisions that this whole board turns on, kept apart. Registration means a product may lawfully be supplied. Subsidy listing means the public system will fund it, for a defined…
Which indication is the script written for?
compounded supply arrangements changed and the threads have not caught up
say which state only if it matters, but always say which country
say which state only if it matters, but always say which country
Disagreeing with this bit: that advice predates the change in compounded arrangements.
Are you quoting advice from before the compounded arrangements changed?
Someone posted US advice in an Australian thread and it took four replies to untangle it. Say your country.
Yes — importing US threads into an Australian question produces confident nonsense every single time.
Are you quoting advice from before the compounded arrangements changed?
Adding the quickest step — ask the pharmacist to check the wholesaler.
Registration by the therapeutic goods regulator establishes that a product may be supplied. Subsidy listing is a separate decision about public funding, with its own criteria and its own timetable.
Disagree — that is registration status, and the question was about subsidy. Different decisions, different bodies.
I would not treat one pharmacy’s quote as the national price. Variation between them is substantial.