[TGA] shortage notice archive, worth bookmarking
Right, the TGA question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 17 data points over 12 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 28, not week 77. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.
What is the PBS status?
Week 17 for me and the honest summary is: 12kg down, nausea manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Maintenance for 11 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
[removed by moderator]
Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.
PBS/TGA claims need the notice or schedule entry
the regulatory Australia is the blocker
PBS/TGA claims need the notice or schedule entry
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
no naming compounders operating against current rules
- 1Maintenance for 11 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is…9 comments in this branch · started by u/careful_gradient_again