[Discussion] dose history is doing more work than we give it credit for
Something I keep coming back to: dose history is doing more work than we give it credit for. Annotated the fortnight I changed training. Without that note the numbers around it would look like a mystery. The attribution problem, which is the reason most logs on this board cannot answer the question their owner is…
log what you did, not what you meant to do
Are the missed weeks in there as blanks or dropped entirely?
the value of a log is in month six, not week one
Built an elaborate spreadsheet, abandoned it by week nine, restarted with four columns and have kept it ever since.
Are the missed weeks in there as blanks or dropped entirely?
Adding the column everyone adds late — sleep. Start with it.
Correcting my own log post above: I had the dose recorded wrongly for one fortnight and have amended it.