am I the only one who found tracking harder than the injections
Question in the title, detail here: am I the only one who found tracking harder than the injections.
A log is a record of what you did. It is not a protocol, and posting one as a schedule for other members is a different thing that this board does not do.
Reconstructed six weeks from memory once and later found receipts that contradicted my own log. Never again.
Built an elaborate spreadsheet, abandoned it by week nine, restarted with four columns and have kept it ever since.
Corrections welcome, especially the pedantic ones. Pedantry is how this board earns its reputation.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Missing entries recorded as blanks preserve the shape of the series. Dropping them silently makes the remaining points look more regular than they were.
A log is only interpretable if the conditions are consistent. Same day, same time, same state, same scale — otherwise you are recording measurement variability rather than change.
I would not draw a trend line through that. Two points and a gap is not a series.
[removed by moderator]
Is the concentration recorded anywhere in the log?
the value of a log is in month six, not week one
Added a sleep column late and immediately understood two of my worst weeks.
Annotation is what makes a log survive contact with your future self. A single note beside an unusual week saves an hour of puzzled reconstruction later.
Careful — posting a log as a schedule for other people to follow is not what this board is for.
Reminder: no dose recommendations for other members, however the post is framed.
Small fix — that is a reconstructed entry rather than a contemporaneous one, and the post presents it as the latter.
Disagree with daily weighing. You are logging fluid, and the emotional cost is real for very little information.
- 1A log is only interpretable if the conditions are consistent. Same day, same…8 comments in this branch · started by u/anya_rautio