GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Failure] two years in, stopped for financial reasons, regained most of it — 26 comments in the full submission. View in context.
443
c/darkspot·submitted 1 months ago by u/ismael_chukwu

[Failure] two years in, stopped for financial reasons, regained most of it

Failurebranch of 10 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 2.5mg to 1.0mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 21 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have muscle…

Read the full submission and all 26 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 1 months ago
u/ledger_modMOD35 points·1 months ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]24 points·1 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivypharmacology10 points·1 months ago

Did anything else change in the same window?

replysharereportpermalink
u/TitrationTortoiseslow and boring5 points·1 months ago

tests that came back 99.2%

replysharereportpermalink
u/endpoint_creep15 points·1 months ago·edited

the lesson is the point

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_frisk10 points·1 months ago

Small correction: the trial was 5 weeks, not 38. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/two_mil_or_one6 points·1 months ago·edited

Small correction: the trial was 5 weeks, not 38.

Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_ramos10 points·1 months ago

decisions people would not make again

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_20247 points·1 months ago

decisions people would not make again

Adding to this: below spec is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwuOP4 points·1 months ago

no "told you so" comments, removed without discussion

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/darkspot

Where the failure reports live. Orders that never arrived, tests that came back at 61%, side effects that ended someone's run, money lost to group buys, and decisions people would not make again. Heavily moderated for cruelty, not for pessimism.

16kmembers
62submissions
Jul 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/darkspot
c/darkspot rules
  1. No piling on. Someone posting a mistake is doing the community a favour.
  2. Still evidence-based: what went wrong, when, and what you can show.
  3. No "told you so" comments. They are removed without discussion.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/burned_once_twiceu/reta_and_regretu/ledger_modu/devils_advocate_d
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →