[Regret] went 0.25 → 1.0 in three weeks and learned why that is dumb
stopped. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/labresults is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort stopped out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 21 months. My ApoB was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
failures, regrets, things that went wrong
Strongly agree. No piling on.
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
no piling on, mistake posts are favours to the community
no piling on, mistake posts are favours to the community
Adding to this: below spec is doing more work than the comment implies.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Small correction: the trial was 6 weeks, not 10. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Small correction: the trial was 5 weeks, not 7. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
decisions people would not make again
the lesson is the point
- 1Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…9 comments in this branch · started by u/tomas_lokken