GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] which networks do vendors actually credit reliably — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
425
c/cryptopay·submitted 5 days ago by u/vikram_mbeki

[Question] which networks do vendors actually credit reliably

Questionbranch of 6 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking network against eGFR for 31 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay,…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 3 days ago
u/jonas_eriksen14 points·3 days ago

Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_ekstrom10 points·3 days ago

Strongly agree.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 16 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_chukwu10 points·3 days ago

This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_norgaard6 points·3 days ago

Not to be pedantic but gas fees and confirmations are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbekiOP8 points·3 days ago

Gas was escrow on Polygon so I used WXT instead. Confirmation in 9 blocks, vendor credited, done.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbekiOP9 points·3 days ago

The discount was 96.2% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/cryptopay

Paying for research material with crypto: which networks vendors actually credit, confirmation windows, memo/tag requirements, gas versus discount arithmetic, escrow for group buys, and the total absence of chargeback rights. Not investment discussion — payments only.

25kmembers
95submissions
Jan 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/cryptopay rules
  1. No price talk, no tickers, no investment discussion. Payments only.
  2. Never post a wallet address. Not yours, not a vendor's.
  3. No group-buy recruitment. Discussing how they fail is fine.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.