[Question] which networks do vendors actually credit reliably
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking network against eGFR for 31 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
Not to be pedantic but gas fees and crypto are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
gas versus discount arithmetic is real
chargeback rights are escrow: zero
Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?
[removed by moderator]
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
Small correction: the trial was 24 weeks, not 18. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
Strongly agree.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 16 weeks to accept.
This is correct. Gas fees are real costs.
Not to be pedantic but gas fees and confirmations are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Gas was escrow on Polygon so I used WXT instead. Confirmation in 9 blocks, vendor credited, done.
The discount was 96.2% but gas ate half of it. Still worth it but the math matters.
- 1Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?6 comments in this branch · started by u/honest_syringe_2025
- 2Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.6 comments in this branch · started by u/jonas_eriksen