[Discussion] the USDC advice in here is 2 years out of date
Posting this as a discussion rather than a claim: the USDC advice in here is 2 years out of date.
Since the title puts numbers in the shop window: 2 years.
Confirmation took forty minutes on a busy evening and I had already written half an angry message. Deleted it.
Nearly sent on the wrong network. The token symbol was identical and the address format was the only clue.
Not medical advice, obviously, and nothing here is approved for human use. One person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
A test transaction costs one extra network fee and verifies the address, the network and the recipient’s crediting process before the main amount moves.
Asked which networks SGN accepted before ordering and picked the cheapest one at that hour. Saved more than the difference in price.
Asked which networks SGN accepted before ordering and picked the cheapest one at that hour.
Disagreeing here: that is a network fee at a busy hour and it is not the supplier’s doing.
escrow arrangements are rare and worth asking about
the memo field matters on the chains that use one
Sent to the right address on the wrong chain years ago. Nothing to be done. That is the lesson I paid for.
Sent to the right address on the wrong chain years ago.
This is the check that prevents the only genuinely unrecoverable mistake in this thread.
Pasted rather than typed the address, then checked the first and last six characters. Habit now.
quote expiry is a real thing, not a pressure tactic
Escrow is not standard in this space. Wanting it is reasonable; expecting it as default is not.
- 1A test transaction costs one extra network fee and verifies the address, the…9 comments in this branch · started by u/enzo_ferrari