the chargeback thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
the chargeback thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down, which sounds obvious until you try to state the evidence for it. A token symbol identifies an asset, not a network. The same symbol commonly exists on several chains with incompatible address formats, and sending across that boundary is…
How many confirmations does it show?
How many confirmations does it show?
Adding the cheap insurance — test amount first on anything large.
the memo field matters on the chains that use one
Agreed. Network first, address second, amount third, and in that order every time.
Escrow is not standard in this space. Wanting it is reasonable; expecting it as default is not.
The transaction hash is the canonical receipt: it is public, verifiable by either party, and it is what a support query should quote.
Escrow is not standard in this space.
This is the check that prevents the only genuinely unrecoverable mistake in this thread.
Sent a test amount first on a large order. Cost me a fraction of a percent and I have done it every time since.
Confirmation took forty minutes on a busy evening and I had already written half an angry message. Deleted it.
Which networks did they list as accepted?
Did the address you sent to match the one you were given, character for character?