[Data] my fridge is 2.1°C at the back and 7.8°C in the door. same fridge.
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 0.5mg, week 93, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — data logger — and tracked it for 3 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
customs clearance often breaks the cold chain, factor that in
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with ice pack, not with what you concluded.
time-at-temperature integral is the dose, not just peak temperature
France to France: 22 days with ERP and 17 days with HJ. Same route, different carriers, variance is real.
Germany to Germany: 12 days with SWB and 24 days with MKM. Same route, different carriers, variance is real.
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises
Reconstituted or dry powder?
Reconstituted or dry powder?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"
Adding to this: packaging is doing more work than the comment implies.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Slight fix: the number was 97.2, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, and actual transit days
Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder
the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises
Small correction: the trial was 9 weeks, not 22. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
- 1excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt…11 comments in this branch · started by u/maren_sorensen
- 2Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…10 comments in this branch · started by u/certified_reference