GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] certificate of analysis — what am I missing here — 52 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.9k
c/coa·submitted 3 months ago by u/bastian_aalto

[Question] certificate of analysis — what am I missing here

Questionbranch of 7 comments

Slightly embarrassed to be asking this, but: certificate of analysis — what am I missing here. Spent four months confusing area% and mass% in every post I made here. One explainer thread and it clicked permanently. Water content 3.8%, acetate 6.2%, purity 99%, net peptide about 90% of label weight. All four numbers…

Read the full submission and all 52 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 3 months ago
u/teodor_jansen190 points·3 months ago

LC-MS gives you identity; UV purity gives you a relative quantity. A document with the first and not the second, or the reverse, is answering half the question.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_aaltoOP278 points·3 months ago

Sent one vial to Janoshik and Medutest. 97.3% and a claimed 97.0%. Cost me more than the vial and I would do it again.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_vermeulen187 points·3 months ago

Right, and net peptide content is where the counterion and the water go. Both numbers can be honest and very different.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_aaltoOP94 points·3 months ago

Asked for the storage condition behind the stability statement. Got it in a sentence. It is a two-line email and almost nobody sends it.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/dead_space_doug66 points·3 months ago·edited

Correction: that is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning, and the document says so if you read the row label.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_aaltoOP-1 point·3 months ago

area% is not mass%, and the difference is the whole game

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/coa

How to read a certificate of analysis and what it does and does not tell you. Area% versus mass%, identity versus quantity, water content, related substances, acetate counterions, and the difference between a vendor-supplied COA and an independent test on the vial you actually received.

71kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/coa rules
  1. Post the full document. Cropped COAs that hide the batch number or date get removed.
  2. Redact your own name and order id, not the vendor's batch details.
  3. No "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.