[Vendor] GGPeps vs GL Biochem on the same compound, same month — both cleared 99.0%
Posting this because the title is the whole finding — GGPeps vs GL Biochem on the same compound, same month — both cleared 99.0% — and a number without its method is a rumour. The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 99.0%. Everything below is context for those. Area percent is the…
Water content 3.8%, acetate 6.2%, purity 99%, net peptide about 90% of label weight. All four numbers honest, and I had to read it twice.
Pushing back a little: a missing field is usually presentation, not concealment. Ask for the full document before drawing conclusions.
net peptide content and purity are two different numbers on the same vial
Pushing back a little: a missing field is usually presentation, not concealment.
low_appetite_lisa has the distinction right — one is a fraction of the detector signal, the other is a fraction of the mass.
Asked for the storage condition behind the stability statement. Got it in a sentence. It is a two-line email and almost nobody sends it.
Ask what the stability statement was written against — temperature, light, and whether it was the lyophilised powder or the reconstituted solution. Those are three different claims.