related substances — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right
The title is the argument: related substances — 9 things I got wrong before I got it right. Here is the rest of it. The PDF creation date being later than the analysis date is usually a re-issue or a re-export. It is worth one question and it is not evidence of anything on its own. Ask what the stability statement…
Related substances itemised individually is a much stronger document than a single total, because it tells you the shape of the impurity profile rather than its size.
Same view. SSA prints the column and the gradient, which means somebody could actually reproduce the run.
post the whole document, not the headline number
Pushing back a little: a missing field is usually presentation, not concealment. Ask for the full document before drawing conclusions.
Yes — and the reason to ask for the whole page is that the interesting parts are the ones people crop out to fit a screenshot.
That is not what the method line says. It names the technique; it does not certify the operator.
the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the page