GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of genuine question about area percent that I am slightly embarrassed to ask — 44 comments in the full submission. View in context.
4.5k
c/coa·submitted 2 months ago by u/ismael_eriksen

genuine question about area percent that I am slightly embarrassed to ask

Explainerbranch of 10 comments

genuine question about area percent that I am slightly embarrassed to ask. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source. The four things a certificate must carry, and what each one is for. Batch identifier ties the document to your vial; without it the document is about somebody else’s…

Read the full submission and all 44 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 2 months ago
u/nadia_fonseca231 points·2 months ago

Net peptide content is the fraction of the powder that is actually peptide once counterion, water and residual solvent are accounted for. A 99% pure acetate salt can still be about 85% peptide by mass.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wrong_network_w276 points·2 months ago

axis labels included, always

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi76 points·2 months ago·edited

HPLC-UV and LC-MS answer different questions

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_eriksenOP142 points·2 months ago

Sent one vial to Medutest and VendorInvestigate. 98.2% and a claimed 97.5%. Cost me more than the vial and I would do it again.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_eriksenOP-20 points·2 months ago

identity and quantity are two questions and most documents answer one

replysharereportpermalink
u/anecdata_annie1 point·2 months ago

the counterion is part of the mass you paid for

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_nkemelu342 points·2 months ago

a total of 0.4% tells you less than four named impurities adding to 0.6%

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]135 points·2 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_jansen0 points·2 months ago

Small fix — 214nm, not 280nm. It matters here because the impurity you are asking about barely absorbs at the longer wavelength.

replysharereportpermalink
u/india_generic_g239 points·2 months ago

Correction: that is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning, and the document says so if you read the row label.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/coa

How to read a certificate of analysis and what it does and does not tell you. Area% versus mass%, identity versus quantity, water content, related substances, acetate counterions, and the difference between a vendor-supplied COA and an independent test on the vial you actually received.

71kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/coa rules
  1. Post the full document. Cropped COAs that hide the batch number or date get removed.
  2. Redact your own name and order id, not the vendor's batch details.
  3. No "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.