[Explainer] the four things a COA must have or it is decorative
purity. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/sideeffects is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort purity out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 12 months. My triglycerides was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash. Turns out the method was solid and the impurity profile was clean.
axis labels included, always
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
Adding to this: batch is doing more work than the comment implies.
Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Slight fix: the number was 95.1, not 94.2.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
Asked TFC for the batch-specific COA and they sent it within six hours, full document, batch number, date, everything. That is the baseline.
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
the batch number or it did not happen
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
- 1axis labels included, always9 comments in this branch · started by u/bastian_aalto
- 2No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot…5 comments in this branch · started by u/camila_lindqvist