three years of related substances threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
three years of related substances threads, summarised so you do not have to read them, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. UV at 214nm sees the peptide bond and picks up almost everything; at 280nm you are looking at aromatics only. Which wavelength the number came from is part of the number. LC-MS…
Right, and net peptide content is where the counterion and the water go. Both numbers can be honest and very different.
the related substances line is where the story is
My first certificate had a compound name, a percentage and a logo. I thought that was normal. It is not, and now I know what to ask for.
My first certificate had a compound name, a percentage and a logo.
noor_cardoso has the distinction right — one is a fraction of the detector signal, the other is a fraction of the mass.
Reminder: a question about a document is not an accusation about a supplier, and posts that blur the two get retitled.
water content is on there and everyone skips it
the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the page