Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
348
[Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 11 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence
the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 98.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.