sequence: what the trials say vs what this community says
sequence: what the trials say vs what this community says. Not a hot take, just something I have not seen said plainly here. Paid for identity confirmation rather than just purity for the first time here. Worth it, and it is not the default on most certificates. Regulatory classification differs between jurisdictions…
Bought small, tested identity first, and only then thought about anything else. That order felt right.
That claim traces back to a single preclinical paper that says something considerably narrower.
Push back: "no reported harms" in a literature with almost no human trials is not a safety finding.
Asked QST for the theoretical mass alongside the certificate and they sent it without asking why.
That claim traces back to a single preclinical paper that says something considerably narrower.
Agreed — and the preclinical to clinical gap is where nearly all the overclaiming happens.