[Discussion] regulatory status changed in several countries and nobody noticed
Week 2 update. 28kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 42.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
regulatory status changed in 16 countries, check yours
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
Genuine question — what concentration were you at?
regulatory status changed in 24 countries, check yours
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
Adding to this: regulatory is doing more work than the comment implies.
the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only
BPC BPC-157 is a naming problem, three things are called this
- 1Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.8 comments in this branch · started by u/ismael_chukwu
- 2the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not6 comments in this branch · started by u/neha_rahimi