how much of what we believe about A1c actually comes from ferritin threads
how much of what we believe about A1c actually comes from ferritin threads, and I want the answer with the reasoning attached rather than just the conclusion.
Compared two draws across two labs and spent a week worrying before finding out the assays were different.
Nobody here can interpret your panel and this comment is not doing so. What a board can usefully do is help you ask better questions of somebody who can.
My TSH moved and I spent a fortnight convinced I knew why. The repeat six weeks later was back in range and I had changed nothing.
Ask me anything specific. Anything general I will probably get wrong.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Substantial weight loss independently moves lipids, liver enzymes and several other markers. Attributing a change to a compound while losing weight is confounded by design.
Different laboratories use different assay platforms with different calibration. Comparing across labs adds a systematic offset that is invisible on the report.
Same view — ApoB if you add one thing. It answers a question the standard panel only gestures at.
ApoB is the one worth adding if you only add one
I would not draw a line through two points, especially when the second was taken at a different time of day.
weight loss itself moves several of these independently
Small fix — a reference interval is not a treatment target, and the post above uses them interchangeably.
That is a non-fasting value and the interval you are comparing it against is a fasting one.
Tracked eGFR against the weight trend for a year. The correlation was much weaker than I expected and that was worth knowing.
Same lab as the previous draw?
lab reference ranges are not treatment targets
Careful — that is a question for whoever ordered the panel, and nobody in this thread can answer it responsibly.
- 1Same view — ApoB if you add one thing. It answers a question the standard…7 comments in this branch · started by u/mikkel_kimani